Legal Opinion

Whitpain Township v. Bodine

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 13, 1953No. Appeal, 45PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. J ustice Aenold,

This is an appeal from the decree of the court be low enjoining defendant’s use of Ms land as a “piggery-”

Under authority given by The Second Class Township Law of 1933, P. L. 103, as amended, 53 PS §19093-2001, et seq., plaintiff-township passed a zoMng ordinance, effective June 7, 1950, providing that: “No piggeries. . . will be permitted within the residential districts of this township.”

Defendant, a resident of New Jersey, owns approximately 67 acres of land in the township, which land the ordinance placed within the highest classification for residential…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lord AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Haller Baking Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Jennings' AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. GRATTON v. CONTESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Cheswick Borough v. BechmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Cleaver v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Anstine v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API