Whitpain Township v. Bodine
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. J ustice Aenold,
This is an appeal from the decree of the court be low enjoining defendant’s use of Ms land as a “piggery-”
Under authority given by The Second Class Township Law of 1933, P. L. 103, as amended, 53 PS §19093-2001, et seq., plaintiff-township passed a zoMng ordinance, effective June 7, 1950, providing that: “No piggeries. . . will be permitted within the residential districts of this township.”
Defendant, a resident of New Jersey, owns approximately 67 acres of land in the township, which land the ordinance placed within the highest classification for residential…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lord AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Haller Baking Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Jennings' AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- GRATTON v. CONTESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Cheswick Borough v. BechmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Cleaver v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Anstine v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.