Legal Opinion

Gaetke v. Ebarr Company, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 15, 1935No. 30,420PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, were joint owners of two lots upon which was a six-room dwelling house used by them and occupied as such. The property ivas worth $6,000 but was subject to a mortgage of $1,800. Defendant company, a Delaware corporation, authorized to do business in Minnesota, OAvned a farm in Kandiyohi county comprising 114.42 acres, subject to a mortgage upon which there was an unpaid balance of $4,500, to which should be added an amortization payment due April 1 and another such falling due October 1, 1932, each amounting to $172.

Plaintiffs were wholly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kirby v. DeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Holmes v. WilkesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Norman v. WengertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Swanson v. DomningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Spiess v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Love v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Goldfine v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  5. ESTATE OF JONES BY BLUME v. KvammeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API