Legal Opinion

O'NEIL v. Vasseur

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 1990No. 17804PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge Pro Tem.

In this appeal, Jerry O’Neil challenges the district court's order granting Thomas Vasseur and Norman Gissel’s motion for summary judgment in an action involving alleged attorney malpractice. We affirm.

We are asked by O’Neil to address several questions:

1. If an attorney, by willful neglect and in bad faith, delays obtaining a judgment for his client, should the attorney be held liable for his client’s damages under a bad faith tort theory?

2. If so whether he should be held liable for damages:(a) —associated with completing performance and mitigating damages in the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Wicker v. HoppockSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Anderson v. EthingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Gulf Atlantic Life Ins. Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Williams v. CallaghanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
  2. Margaret H. Wayne Trust v. LipskyIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Vendelin v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Vaught v. Dairyland InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  5. McGilvray v. Farmers New World Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API