Legal Opinion

Parrish v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 26, 1994No. 490-91PublishedCited by 212 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND FROM UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

MEYERS, Judge.

On original submission, 872 S.W.2d 224, we remanded this cause to the trial court with instructions that the complaint and information charging appellant with driving while intoxicated (DWI) be dismissed. Applying Grady v. Corbin, 495 U.S. 508, 510, 110 S.Ct. 2084, 2087, 109 L.Ed.2d 548 (1990), as understood by this Court in State v. Houth, 845 S.W.2d 853 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), we held that appellant’s prior conviction for speeding was a jeopardy bar to her subsequent prosecution for DWI. The United States Supreme Court granted…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Day v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by212 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Bigon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  3. Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  4. Manrique v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  5. Littrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008

207 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API