Legal Opinion

Gillen v. Martini

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 1971No. Docket 9320PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, J.

This is a slip and fall case. Plaintiff, Arlene Gillen, brought this action claiming that defendants, James and Ann Martini, were negligent in failing to remove a natural accumulation of ice and snow from the private walkway to their home, and that such negligence was a proximate cause of plaintiff’s fall and ensuing injuries. At the nonjury trial, defendants cross-examined plaintiff’s witnesses, but offered no proofs and rested their case on a motion for directed verdict. They appeal as of right from the judgment entered for plaintiff.

Plaintiff is an antique dealer. She went to defendants’…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Shorkey v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Weider v. GoldsmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Levendoski v. GeisenhaverMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Perl v. Cohodas, Peterson, Paoli, Nast Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Quinlivan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Tate v. RiceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  3. Whinnen v. 231 CORP.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Woodworth v. BrennerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Mendyk v. Michigan Employment Security CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API