Shorkey v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
Plaintiff, while a customer in defendant’s store and following the manager to the rear of the store to be shown some goods, stepped on a hot-air register located near a counter about the center of the store. . The heel of her shoe went through a hole in the register and she was thrown and injured. She had verdict of a jury and judgment for damages. Defendant asks judgment non obstante for lack of negligence on the part of defendant and for contributory negligence of plaintiff.
Plaintiff’s heels were high and about three-quarter inch by one inch across the bottom. She had worn similar shoes for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rice v. Goodspeed Real Estate Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Hill Grocery Co. v. HamekerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
- Steggall v. W. T. Knapp & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by36 opinions
- Quinlivan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Nezworski v. MazanecMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Hulett v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Boyle v. PreketesMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Cooper v. Pritchard Motor Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.