Perl v. Cohodas, Peterson, Paoli, Nast Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.
Plaintiff brought an action for damages, claiming that he had sustained injuries from a fall on defendant’s premises resulting from the latter’s negligence. On trial before a jury, he was awarded a verdict of $12,484. The circuit court denied defendant’s motion for a new trial, but ordered a remittitur of $2,484. Defendant- appeals, and plaintiff cross-appeals.
Plaintiff was formerly a warehouse foreman in the city of Ironwood, employed by a railroad company. Defendant is a corporation engaged in carrying on a wholesale fruit, vegetable, tobacco* and confectionery business in a warehouse in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schmidt v. Michigan Coal & Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Hopson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Mayo v. Village of BaragaMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Gerrie v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Chatkin v. TalarskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
3Cited by21 opinions
- Stitt v. Holland Abundant Life FellowshipMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Quinlivan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Nezworski v. MazanecMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Torma v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Salvati v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.