Legal Opinion

Perl v. Cohodas, Peterson, Paoli, Nast Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1940No. Docket No. 24, Calendar No. 40,923PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.

Plaintiff brought an action for damages, claiming that he had sustained injuries from a fall on defendant’s premises resulting from the latter’s negligence. On trial before a jury, he was awarded a verdict of $12,484. The circuit court denied defendant’s motion for a new trial, but ordered a remittitur of $2,484. Defendant- appeals, and plaintiff cross-appeals.

Plaintiff was formerly a warehouse foreman in the city of Ironwood, employed by a railroad company. Defendant is a corporation engaged in carrying on a wholesale fruit, vegetable, tobacco* and confectionery business in a warehouse in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Michigan Coal & Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Hopson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Mayo v. Village of BaragaMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Gerrie v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Chatkin v. TalarskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Stitt v. Holland Abundant Life FellowshipMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Quinlivan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Nezworski v. MazanecMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Torma v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Salvati v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API