Legal Opinion

Friends of Morningside Hill v. City of Salem

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 13, 1999No. 97C-12068; CA A100792Published

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Plaintiffs1 brought this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief in relation to defendant City’s proposed widening of an intersection at Madrona Avenue and 12th Street in Salem. After a trial to the court,2 the court held in favor of defendant. We affirm.

In 1992, the Salem electorate passed a General Obligation Street Improvement Bond program that authorized use of any excess funds for “additional transportation/safety improvements to the City’s street system.” In 1995, the Salem electorate passed a General Obligation Pedestrian Safety Improvements Bond Authorization for which the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stringham v. Union County People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Willamette Tug & Barge Co. v. Commercial Dispatching Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Barde v. FunkOregon Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API