Legal Opinion

Barde v. Funk

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

On the 20th day of May, 1932, the voters of the city of Portland adopted section 344 of the municipal charter of said city, which is as follows:

“Section 344. Bonds for Public Work. The Council is hereby authorized, in the name of and under the corporate seal of the City of Portland, to issue and dispose of bonds of the City of Portland in an amount not exceeding one million dollars ($1,000,000), in the denomination of one hundred dollars ($100.00), five hundred dollars ($500.00) or one thousand dollars ($1,000.00), as the Council may determine, and in such form as the Council shall elect,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thomas v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Starin v. . the Town of GenoaNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  3. Dively v. City of Cedar FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
  4. City of Beaumont v. Matthew Cartwright Land & Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Town of Camden v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Friends of Morningside Hill v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Stringham v. Union County People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API