Legal Opinion

Davis v. Fisk Electric Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 2008No. 06-0162PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Jefferson

joined by Justice HECHT, Justice O’NEILL, Justice WAINWRIGHT, Justice MEDINA, Justice GREEN, Justice JOHNSON, and Justice WILLETT.

Our rules generally permit each party in a civil action to exercise six peremptory strikes, which are challenges “made to a juror without assigning any reason therefor.” Tex.R. Civ. P. 232, 233. But peremptories exercised for an improper reason, like race or gender, are unconstitutional. In this case, the African American petitioner asserted that he was terminated based on his race. The respondents used peremptory challenges at trial to exclude five of six African…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Mariner Health Care of Nashville, Inc. v. Robins, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  2. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Lisa Chamberlin v. Marshall Fisher, CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  4. Moeller v. Blanc, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  5. Robert Nathaniel Jones v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API