Legal Opinion
State v. Krause
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 25, 2012No. A10-1091PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.
Appellant Jeffrey Arthur Krause asks us to decide whether the district court (1) erred in ruling that he forfeited his right to appointed counsel and (2) denied him procedural due process at his forfeiture-of-counsel hearing.1 Krause was charged by amended complaint in Otter Tail County District Court with three counts of fourth-degree controlled substance crime and one count of possession of a firearm by an ineligible person. A public defender was appointed to represent him. Prior to trial, the Chief Public Defender for the Seventh Judicial District made a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Johnson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- State of Minnesota v. Clarence Bruce BeaulieuSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Johnson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- State v. StantonOregon Supreme Court · 2022
- State of Minnesota v. Richard Ellis HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.