Legal Opinion
Vlahakis
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 27, 1978No. 158-77PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
"This pro se case is before the court, without oral argument, on the defendant’s motion to dismiss. The plaintiff alleges that he has suffered financial loss in connection with various real estate and financial transactions as a result of the conspiracies of executive and judicial officials of the State of Illinois, that he was falsely imprisoned in the Cook County jail, and that his wife was temporarily paralyzed from the shock of his imprisonment. He seeks damages from the defendant because the federal courts have negligently failed to protect his 4th, 5th, and 14th amendment rights under…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Algonac Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Vincin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Clark v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Pikulin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Alabama Hospital Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Gordon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Warren v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Smith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.