Legal Opinion
Smith v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 26, 2001No. 01-127CPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.
This action is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) *37of the United States Court of Federal Claims. Plaintiff, James Soloman Smith, Jr., seeks $50 million for alleged constitutional violations stemming from his arrest, prosecution, and conviction for first-degree arson in the Superior Court of Clayton County, Georgia. After careful consideration, defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is granted.
FACTS
In 1992, plaintiff was convicted in Georgia Superior Court of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Roland A. Leblanc v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- McCauley v. StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Milas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Alston-Bullock v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Ogden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Nalette v. StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Nwogu v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.