Legal Opinion

Gottlieb v. C R Bard Incorporated

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided July 28, 2021No. 3:19-cv-00673Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division KIMBERLY GOTTLIEB, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Vv. ) Case No. 3:19cv673-—HEH ) C. R. BARD, INC., a New Jersey Corporation, ) BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC., ) (a subsidiary and/or division of defendant C. R. ) BARD, INC.), an Arizona Corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION (Granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment) This products liability case is one of many filed against Defendants C.R. Bard and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) concerning inferior vena cava (“IVC”)…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  3. Dorn B. Holland v. Washington Homes, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  4. Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi ABCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  5. Thompson Everett, Inc. v. National Cable Advertising, L.P. Cable Networks, Inc. Cable Media CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API