Legal Opinion

David v. Philadelphia Electric Co.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 1988No. Appeal, 2845 C. D. 1986PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Barbieri,

This is an appeal by sixteen landowners1 from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County denying their motion for summary judgment and granting the motion of Philadelphia Electric Company (PECO) for summary judgment. Appellants sought to enjoin PECO’s use of the upper reaches of the East Branch of *443the Perkiomen Creek as a conduit to transport Delaware River water to PECOs nuclear power generating station in Limerick, Montgomery County.

The facts of this case, as stipulated by the parties, are as follows. Appellants are riparian owners of lands along…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. KOTWASINSKI v. RASNERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Kauffman v. GriesemerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  3. Chamberlin v. CiaffoniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Lentz v. Carnegie Bros., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County1892
  5. Jones v. Boeing CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest v. HassellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  2. Village of Four Seasons Ass'n v. Elk Mountain Ski Resort, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Fazio v. Fegley Oil Co., Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Gabel v. CambruzziSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Anglers of AuSable, Inc. v. Department of Environmental QualityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API