Legal Opinion

Comer v. Meyer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On error to the Passaic Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Trenchard, J.

Elmer Comer, the plaintiff below, was employed by Meyer Brothers, the defendants below, as a drive:'. Meyer Brothers conduct, as partners, a department store in Paterson. The plaintiff was furnished with a horse and wagon by the person in charge of the defendants’ stable. He drove to the store and loaded the wagon, and proceeded to deliver the defendants’ goods. While driving along a slight rise on the Saddle Itiver road, the king-bolt broke and the whiffle tree dropped upon the horse’s heels, causing it to jump forward and run away. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Batton v. Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  2. McDonald v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
  3. Andrecsik v. New Jersey Tube Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
  4. Dowd v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  5. Belleville Stone Co. v. MooneySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pavan v. Worthen & Aldrich Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  2. Zellers v. DelanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API