Legal Opinion

Dowd v. Erie Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 23, 1904PublishedCited by 12 opinions

In. tort. On rule to show cause.

1Opinion of the Court

Tlie opinion of the court was delivered by

Swayze, J.

The plaintiff was employed by the defendant as a bolt-cutter, in its shops at North Paterson, from August 9th, 1902, until tlie accident which occasioned his injury, on August 25th, of the same year. On that day, while trying to stop the machine by shifting the belt from the tight, to the loose pulley, his hand slipped off the shifting lever, he lost jiis balance, his right hand fell on the cogs, which were unguarded, was caught in the gearing and- so injured that it had to be .amputated.- The plaintiff was an expert bolt-cutter, accustomed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Foley v. Jersey City Electric Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  3. Belleville Stone Co. v. MooneySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  4. Dillenberger v. WeingartnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Konig v. Nevada-California-Oregon RailwayNevada Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Andrecsik v. New Jersey Tube Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
  3. Dunkerley v. Webendorfer Machine Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  4. Lupher v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  5. Crosby v. Cuba R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API