Belleville Stone Co. v. Mooney
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Essex Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Lippincott, J.
The defendant in error, plaintiff below, was a quarrytnau in the employ of the Belleville Stone Company of New Jersey, plaintiff in error, defendant below, in its stone quarry at Avondale. It will be more convenient to denominate the parties as plaintiff and defendant, as in the action in the Circuit Court.
On March 24th, 1897, the plaintiff was injured by being struck by a stone from a blast of rocks in the quarry. At the time of the accident he was working at the foot of a derrick, some distance from where the blasting was going on and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Eckert v. . the Long Island Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Linnehan v. SampsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Laning v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Donahoe v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Coffeyville Vitrified Brick & Tile Co. v. ShanksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Hendrickson v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Dowd v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
- Burns v. Delaware & Atlantic Telegraph & Telephone Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.