Legal Opinion
Ayres v. Lucas
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 2, 1945No. 17,374PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.
The appellant brought this action to enjoin appellees from interfering with his removal of a pipe-line laid under the surface of appellee’s land. He was unsuccessful below, and appeals from the overruling of his motion for new trial, which specifies (1) that the decision is not sustained by sufficient evidence and (2) it is contrary to law.
The first specification of the motion for new trial is inappropriate and presents no question. The second is sufficient to raise a question under (2) above. Wilson, Admx. v. Rollings (1938), 214 Ind. 155, 14 N. E. (2d) 905; McKee v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilson, Admx. v. RollingsIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
- McKee v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
- Fudge v. MarquellIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Ray v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
- Mahoney v. GanoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Reed v. LuznyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Metrailer v. BishopIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959
- Southern Union Gas Co. v. CantrellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
- Waid v. WaidIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946
- S & S Enterprises v. Marathon Ashland Petroleum, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003