Waid v. Waid

In this case the appellee sought and obtained a divorce from the appellant on a complaint charging cruel and inhuman treatment. The sole question presented challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the decision of the court. The appellee contends that a specification of error in a motion for a new trial “that the decision of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence” is inappropriate and presents no question. Such is the law only where the decision complained of is wholly negative. Ayres v. Lucas (1945), 116 Ind. App. 431, 63 N. E. (2d) 204; Wadler v. Mogul Rubber…