Wieder v. Towmotor Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TROUTMAN, District Judge.
Defendant, Towmotor Corporation (Tow-motor), moving for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, argues generally that plaintiff’s 1 proofs are legally insufficient to support the verdict. Towmotor’s primary contentions in this products liability case are that plaintiff failed to adduce any evidence of a “defect”, that plaintiff’s alternative design concept is not feasible, that the intervening negligence of a third party was the proximate cause of the accident and that plaintiff’s counsel admitted to the jury that the third party’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Huddell v. LevinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Patricia A. Hollinger, Administratrix of the Estate of Germaine S. Hollinger, Deceased v. Wagner Mining Equipment Company, a Division of Paccar, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Paul J. Glick v. White Motor Company v. North American Rockwell Corp., (Third Party Defendant)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Van Buskirk v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Hayes v. Xerox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Van Buskirk v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Pearsall v. Emhart Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Jacobs Manufacturing Co. v. Sam Brown Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.