Legal Opinion
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Oregon Pacific Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 19, 1975No. 73-1210PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Mr. Justice Douglas, announced by Mr. Chief Justice Burger.
This is an appeal from a judgment of a three-judge District Court, 28 U. S. C. § 1253, which held invalid an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission promul*185gating a car Service Order 1 under § 1 (15) of the Interstate Commerce Act, as amended, 41 Stat. 476, 49 U. S. C. § 1 (15).2 Oregon Pacific Industries v. United States, 365 F. Supp. 609 (Ore. 1973).
*186Lumber is often moved to market on a wholesalers' sale-in-transit schedule. Cars are sent to hold points, where in time reconsignment orders are received for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Avent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Turner, Dennis & Lowry Lumber Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Iversen v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Illinois Central Railroad Company, Cross-Appellant v. Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Central Vermont Railway, Inc., Duluth, Winnipeg and Pacific Railway, and the Detroit and Toledo Shore Line Railroad Company, Intervenors, Burlington Northern Inc. And Union Pacific Railroad Company, Intervenors, Duval Sales Corporation, International Minerals & Chemical Corporation, Evans Products Company and Pullman Leasing Company, Intervenors, the Texas Mexican Railway Company, Intervenor. Aliquippa and Southern Railroad Company v. United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Duval Sales Corporation, International Minerals & Chemical Corporation, Evans Products Company and Pullman Leasing Company, Intervenors, the Texas Mexican Railway Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Monongahela Power Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Central Illinois Public Service Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.