Legal Opinion
Middle Atlantic Conference v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 21, 1972No. Civ. A. 1166-70PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before TAMM * and MacKINNON,* Circuit Judges, and PARKER, District Judge. MacKINNON, Circuit Judge:
This is an action seeking to set aside and enjoin a report and order of the Interstate Commerce Commission (Commission). Our jurisdiction is invoked under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1336, 1398, 2284, 2321 and 2325. Briefly stated, the Commission order prohibits motor common carriers from specifying in their tariffs that certain warehousemen, pier operators, brokers, steamship agencies, and others similarly situated (generally referred to hereinafter as warehousemen), who are neither consignors nor…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- The Apollon.Supreme Court of the United States · 1824
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. GrovesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Federal Commerce & Navigation Co., Ltd. v. Calumet Harbor Terminals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- CSX Transportation Co. v. Novolog Bucks CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Illinois Central Railroad Company v. South Tec Development Warehouse, Inc., Defendant-Third Party v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Matson Navigation Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.