B. F. Sturtevant Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtMayer, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). It is conceded that the decision below was in accord with the decisions of the New York courts. A case precisely in point is Eastern Steel Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co., decided by the New York Supreme Court per Mr. Justice Greenbaum, and unanimously affirmed in 186 App. Div. 892, 172 N. Y. Supp. 888, and then in 227 N. Y. 586, 125 N. E. 917.
It is urged, however, that a bond such as this contains a dual contract — i. e., (1) an agreement to pay the city; and (2) an agreement to pay all those who supplied labor and material — and to support this contention…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Baker & Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- R. Connor Co. v. Ætna Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- The Eastern Steel Company v. . Globe Indemnity CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Dupay v. GalbinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
3Cited by5 opinions
- Community Bldg. Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
- Corporation of President of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1939
- Salway v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- William S. Van Clief & Sons, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1931