Legal Opinion
Loughlin v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 3, 2002No. CIV.A.02-152(ESH)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have brought these personal injury cases, 1 alleging a variety of torts against defendants American University (“American” or “AU”), the United States of America, and Glenbrook Limited Partnership, Lawrence N. Brandt, Inc., Lawrence N. Brandt, and Robert Brandt (the “Glenbrook-Brandt Defendants”). The central claim of plaintiffs — the Loughlin family, Patricia Gillum, and Camille Saurn^ — -is that defendants negligently failed to warn them of the presence of munitions, highly toxic chemicals, and chemical warfare agents in the Spring Valley…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Ronald T. Phillips v. Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Field v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
- Loughlin, Thomas P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Loughlin v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Loughlin v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Jach v. American UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003