Legal Opinion

Healey v. First National Stores, Inc.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 2, 1943Published

1Opinion of the CourtPettingell, P. J.

Action of tort or contract in which the plaintiff seeks to recover for injuries caused by eating liver purchased from the defendant by the plaintiff’s daughter, the trial judge finding that the liver was unfit for food. There was a finding for the plaintiff. The defendant filed eight requests for rulings of which three were allowed, one was waived at the trial, and four were denied. These four requests, and the dispositions of them by the trial judge, are as follows :

“1. Upon all the evidence, the court is warranted in finding that there was no contract between the plaintiff and defendant.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Gearing v. BerksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Barnes v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Cleary v. First National Stores Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Manning v. CampbellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. Groce v. First National Stores Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API