Republic of the Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
*385OPINION
DEBEVOISE, District Judge.
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and Local Rule 40(D)(4)(a), defendants Westinghouse Electric Corporation and Westinghouse International Projects Company (“Westinghouse”) appeal portions of two of Magistrate Hedges’ discovery orders.
FACTS
In 1978 the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) began investigating Westinghouse for securities violations relating to alleged illegal payments made to obtain a contract with the Philippine government in connection with the Philippine Nuclear Power Plant project (“PNPP”).
In response to the SEC’s initial inquiries,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Diversified Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James H. Meredith, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. San Clemente Financial Group Securities, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BradyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
- Gerald Chamales Corp. v. Oki Data Americas, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Republic of the PhilippinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.