Dortic v. Dugas
Supreme Court of Georgia
Injunction. Debtor and creditor. Before Judge Gibson. Richmond county. At chambers. January 16th, 1874. Dortic filed his bill against Dugas, in which he set up various claims against the defendant, growing out of the partnership of Holt, Dugas & Company, of which they had both been members.
Read the full summary
Injunction. Debtor and creditor. Before Judge Gibson. Richmond county. At chambers. January 16th, 1874. Dortic filed his bill against Dugas, in which he set up various claims against the defendant, growing out of the partnership of Holt, Dugas & Company, of which they had both been members. The bill' set out several pieces of property belonging to the defendant, and others in which he had a remainder interest, all of which would barely be sufficient to satisfy the decree which might be had upon a final trial. It alleged .that the defendant was endeavoring to sell said property, and that if ho…
1Opinion of the Court
McCay, Judge.
We do not care to go into the merits of the complainant’s demand in this case. It may be that he has been deeply wronged; it may be that he is justly entitled to recover damages of the defendant, or it may be not a just complaint* That will depend upon the evidence at the hearing. We are clear, however,’that the judge was right'in refusing the injunction. No case can be found where an injunction, ad interim, has been granted to prevent the defendant from selling his own property, on which the complainant has no lien, or in which he has no interest, to await the establishment of…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Bishop v. PattonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- Watson v. WhatleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Authur v. Bank of Ball GroundSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Fullerton Cotton Mills Inc. v. ButlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Mar-Pak Michigan, Inc. v. PointerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.