Legal Opinion

Wall v. Rhodes

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 18, 1965No. 41640PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

1. Under the Appellate Practice Act of 1965 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18 et seq.), 'Code Ann. § 6-1201 sets out a suggested form for the enumeration of errors from which it is clear that the subject matter need be indicated only in the most general way. It follows that without the aid of the brief of counsel, this court frequently cannot identify or pass upon the contention which the appellant seeks to urge as cause for reversal. Indubitably, where the error enumerated is not intelligible in itself the brief must make it so, or this court has nothing before it for decision. Rule 17 of this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kendrick v. KendrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  2. Atlanta Joint Terminals v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  3. Garmon v. CassellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  4. Gee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  5. Rodgers v. StylesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Felix v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. MacDonald v. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Home Indemnity Company v. GodleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Strickland v. EnglishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  5. Rawls Bros. v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API