Legal Opinion

Gee v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 24, 1964No. 40909, 40910PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

The defendants assign error on the overruling of demurrers to their indictment as accessories before the fact to larceny of an automobile, and to the overruling of their motions for new trial. Held:

1. The indictment charged the defendants with the offense of being accessories before the fact to larceny of “one Oldsmobile Starfire Coupe automobile of the value of $3,000.00 and the property of Belvedere Builders, Inc.” The trial court did not err in overruling the defendants’ demurrers on the ground that the indictment does not give the year model, the serial number, or the motor…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kendrick v. KendrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  2. Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  3. Huff v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Smaha v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  5. Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Geiger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. State v. RollieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Wall v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Lane v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  5. Black v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API