Rawls Bros. v. Paul
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pannell, Judge.
The petition alleged substantially the following:
The principal defendant, through its agent, also a defendant, persuaded the plaintiffs to purchase from the principal defendant some tire recapping equipment for use on plaintiffs’ “Bacon American No. 122” tire recapping machinery, which new equipment was to be adaptable and attached to plaintiffs’ equipment, that the sale contract provided for four templates for “B/A No. 122 design—754, 804, 854, 904,” the templates being essential parts required to make the new machinery adjusted to the plaintiffs’ existing machinery.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mauldin v. ShefferCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Strickland v. EnglishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Leonard v. Firemen's InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. SpinksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Fain v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Orkin Exterminating Co. v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Sims v. American Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Hamilton v. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & MurphyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Smith v. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1990
- Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance v. Thomas Milling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.