Legal Opinion

Fuhs v. Barber

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 3, 1934No. 31,722PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

Marie Fuhs, a housewife, twenty-eight years of age, contracted a skin irritation from poison ivy, in May, 1932. It was under her chin and extended well down upon her chest. She consulted Doctor Anderson, and he prescribed as a remedy the use of sugar of lead, which she procured at a drug store. When that sugar of lead had been applied as the doctor prescribed, she went to the store of the defendant, P. B. Barber, to obtain another prescription of sugar of lead. After making the purchase of the sugar of lead and while Mr. Barber was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. MarshallMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Allan v. State Steamship Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Dettmer v. FullsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. Gibson v. TorbertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  5. Smith v. GreggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Krueger v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. Jones v. IrvinDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1985
  3. Stebbins v. Concord Wrigley Drugs, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Tritle v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. French Drug Co., Inc. v. JonesMississippi Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API