Legal Opinion

Bland v. Roberts

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided April 24, 2012No. Civil Action No. 4:11cv45PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

RAYMOND A. JACKSON, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant B.J. Roberts’ Motion for Summary Judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On January 23, 2012, this Court issued an Order granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. In that Order, the Court informed the parties that a Memorandum Opinion and Order detailing its rationale for the ruling would follow. Pursuant to that Order, the Court now issues this Memorandum Opinion and Order. For the reasons stated herein, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

I.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bobby Bland v. B. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  2. Vollette v. WatsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
  3. Bobby Bland v. B. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  4. Liverman v. City of PetersburgDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
  5. Bobby Bland v. B. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API