Legal Opinion

Cornelius Smith v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 10, 1989No. 88-5486PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Per curiam

Cornelius Smith filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence based on several grounds. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1982). The district court changed Smith’s special parole from life to a three-year term, but denied all other relief. Smith responded by filing a motion to alter or amend the judgment. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). He also requested an evidentiary hearing. The court denied Smith’s motion. Smith now appeals. Because all of Smith’s contentions are meritless, we affirm.

As part of an agreement with the Government, Smith pleaded guilty to the following charges: receipt of a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Charles Poor Thunder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  2. William Burl Roudybush and Ruth J. Roudybush v. Ralph W. Zabel, Zabel Ltd. And First National Bank in LenoxCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  3. Harold Edwin O'Leary v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. Telesforo PortilloCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  5. Charles Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Matthew v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. HammerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Harvey Russell Wright, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Paul James Jennings, United States of America v. Robert Lee JenningsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. Kenneth Eugene Bousley v. Joseph M. Brooks, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API