Legal Opinion

United States v. Hammer

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 23, 1993No. Nos. 92-2606, 92-2608, 92-2614, 92-2674 and 92-2678PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

In this case five defendants, each of whom pleaded guilty, appeal their sentences for drug-related crimes. One of the principal questions presented is the constitutionality of the continuing-eriminal-enterprise statute, 21 U.S.C. § 848(b), which provides for a mandatory life sentence for someone whose enterprise involves 30 kilograms of a mixture or substance containing methamphetamine. We hold that the statute is valid.

Issues are also presented as to the proper procedure to be used in sentencing under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. In United States v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Wade v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. James Michael WiseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Ernest R. Streeter, United States of America v. Robert Jay CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Michael Brian FortierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Holland v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  2. United States v. Reed Raymond PriorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Thomas Lee FarmerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Forriss D. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. David Joseph MickelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API