Legal Opinion
Charles Poor Thunder v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 6, 1987No. 85-5382PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
In 1983 Fed.R.Crim.P. 32 was amended to require the district courts to give a defendant a chance to examine the presen-tence investigation report, to listen to any objections the defendant might have to the report, and to make findings as to any controverted matters, or to determine that no such findings are necessary because the matters controverted will not be taken into account in sentencing. Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D). The amended Rule further requires that a written record of the sentencing court’s findings and determinations shall accompany any copy of the report…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kaufman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- United States v. Monte Allen ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Bruce E. Holloway v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Ralph R. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Kenneth Ray MartinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Juan Gerardo Hernandez, Also Known as ChapinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.