Legal Opinion

Allis v. Voigt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to superior court of Grand Rapids. (Burlingame, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action grows out of a contract mentioned in Allis v. Voigt, 83 Mich. 537. That portion of the contract necessary to a discussion of the principles here involved is set out in that case.

The contract contains the following clause:

“ The above machinery to be erected in the Crescent Mills, Grand Eapids, Michigan, without expense to you, except that you shall do all teaming required in Grand Eapids, and furnish all mason and carpenter work.”

The declaration in the present case counts—

1. Upon the undertaking of the defendants safely to convey said fly-wheel from the depot at Grand Eapids to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allen v. . SackriderNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  2. Hutchings v. LaddMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Allis v. VoigtMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Shaw v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis Gasoline Engine Works Co. v. McHughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Grand Rapids Electric Co. v. Walsh Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Roger Angstman Co. v. Liggett Spring & Axle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Acorn Refining Co. v. KnowlsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API