Legal Opinion

Acorn Refining Co. v. Knowlson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1915No. Docket No. 23Published

Error to Kent; Brown, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by the Acorn Refining Company against Abram B. Knowlson for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

The action is brought to recover the price and value of goods sold and delivered. The principal issues made were, first, whether defendant’s agent, between whom and an agent of plaintiff the bargain was made, was acting within his authority; second, whether the defendant, whatever his agent’s authority may have been, ratified the agent’s action and agreement. A third issue was tendered by defendant, which was that defendant’s agent was by fraud, practiced by plaintiff’s agent, induced to make a bargain. Suit was begun in justice’s court, where the pleadings were oral, and plaintiff recovered.

W…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leo Austrian & Co. v. SpringerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Inglish v. AyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Grand Rapids Electric Co. v. Walsh Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Allis v. VoigtMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API