Roger Angstman Co. v. Liggett Spring & Axle Co.

These are actions in assumpsit. The plaintiff in the case of Roger W. Angstman v. Liggett Spring & Axle Company declared upon the common counts, and especially upon a 'written contract dated January 1,1923. The case of The Roger Angstman Company v. Liggett Spring & Axle Company was also based upon the common counts, and especially upon a written memorandum in the form of a letter dated October 21, 1927, addressed to plaintiff, The Roger Angstman Company, and signed by defendant, by its general manager. By stipulation of counsel, the proofs taken in both cases, which were tried and submitted…