Legal Opinion
McBroom v. Ethicon Incorporated
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided March 15, 2021No. 2:20-cv-02127Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 No. CV-20-02127-PHX-DGC 9 Amanda McBroom, 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Ethicon, Inc.; and Johnsons & Johnson, 13 Defendants. 14 15 On January 15, 2021, the Court denied Defendants’ motion for leave to file a 16 supplemental motion for summary judgment. Docs. 64, 76 at 3. Defendants have filed a 17 motion for reconsideration of that ruling. Doc. 84. The Court will deny the motion.1 18 A. Reconsideration Standard. 19 Motions for reconsideration are disfavored and rarely granted. See Nw. Acceptance 20 Corp. v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Motorola, Inc. v. J.B. Rodgers Mechanical Contractors, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2003
- United National Insurance v. Spectrum Worldwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.