Legal Opinion

Wood v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Division of American Home Products

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2002No. 2000-SC-1067-DGPublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice.

I

In 1973, the United States Federal Food and Drug Administration approved the use and sale of fenfluramine, an appetite suppressing diet medication. The drug was tested, manufactured, and packaged by A.H. Robins and sold by Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, under the trade name Pondi-min. Appellees, American Home Products Corporation (hereinafter referred to collectively as “AHPC”), of which Wyeth-Ayerst is a division, also marketed another FDA-approved medication for obesity containing fenfluramine, called Redux. Demand for fenfluramine soared during the mid-1990’s, when people…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Metro-North Commuter Railroad v. BuckleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Deutsch v. SheinKentucky Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Saylor v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
  4. Louisville Trust Co. v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Davis v. GravissKentucky Supreme Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Caronia v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Henry v. Dow Chemical CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Terlecki v. StewartMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Vasquez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  5. Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API