Fust v. Attorney General
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HOLSTEIN, Chief Justice.
Carl and Rita Fust are judgment creditors. They were awarded $330,000 in punitive damages in a malicious prosecution action in 1994. This judgment was affirmed on appeal. Fust v. Francois, 913 S.W.2d 38 (Mo. App.1995). Here, the Fusts seek a declaratory judgment that sec. 537.675 1 , enacted as part of House Bill 700, Laws of 1987, p. 545, et seq. (HB 700), is unconstitutional. That section provides that 50% of any punitive damages judgment is deemed rendered in favor of the State of Missouri. The Circuit Court of Cole County found the statute constitutional. This…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hodel v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Whitlow v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lincoln Credit Co. v. PeachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Blaske v. Smith & Entzeroth, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Arbino v. Johnson & JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- Sanders v. AhmedSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Missouri Health Care Ass'n v. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.