Legal Opinion
Cole's Wexford Hotel, Inc. v. UPMC
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 1, 2015No. Case No. 10-1609PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONTI, Chief Judge.
I. Introduction
Pending before the court in this antitrust action is a motion to dismiss the third amended complaint filed by defendant Highmark, Inc. (“Highmark”) (ECF No. 288) and a motion to dismiss the third amended complaint filed by defendant UPMC (ECF No. 290). UPMC and High-mark argue, among other things, that the third amended complaint filed by plaintiff Cole’s Wexford Hotel, Inc. (“Cole’s Wex-ford”) 1 fails to state any claim for relief and the class action allegations contained in the third amended complaint are insufficient as a matter of law under…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- BENNINGER v. OHIO TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENTDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- DOOLEY v. DASHERDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- SALYERS v. A.J. BLOSENSKI, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- Samuel v. Centene CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024