Legal Opinion

People v. Gonzalez

California Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 2003No. S107167PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

In People v. Scott (1994) 9 Cal.4th 331 [36 Cal.Rptr.2d 627, 885 P.2d 1040] (Scott), this court held that a party in a criminal case may not challenge the trial court’s discretionary sentencing choices on appeal if that party did not object at trial. Scott stressed, however, that counsel must have a “meaningful opportunity to object [which] can occur only if, during the course of the sentencing hearing itself and before objections are made, the parties are clearly apprised of the sentence the court intends to impose, and the reasons that support any discretionary sentencing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. People v. BoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. In Re Sheena K.California Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. Sperling, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. People v. WeddingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API