Legal Opinion

Oklahoma City Packing & Provision Co. v. Pearson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 10, 1923No. 11414PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREADGILL, C.

The defendants in error were plaintiffs and the plaintiffs in error were defendants in the court below and will be referred to herein as they appeared therein. The defendant, E. E. Sparrow, having at this time no interest in the controversy, the term, “defendant” will be applied to the Oklahoma City Packing & Provision Company. The action was commenced by the plaintiffs on the 26th day of August, 1912, in the district court of Oklahoma county, state of Oklahoma, against the defendants.

The petition alleged, in substance, that on the 1st day of duly, 1909, the defendant,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ThomasMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Producers' Oil Co. v. EatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Boggs v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  4. Page v. TurkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. First National Bank of Tulsa v. Colonial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. State Nat. Bank of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Bailey & Collins v. Ryan Cotton Oil Mill Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Van Antwerp v. GarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API