Legal Opinion

Schmitz v. Heger

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Traill County; McConnell, J. Action by Mike Schmitz against Antonio Heger. From an order refusing a new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWallin, C. J.

In this action, plaintiff sues to recover money claimed to be due him from the defendant upon contract. There was a jury trial, resulting in a verdict for the plaintiff. Defendant served notice of intention to move in the District Court to vacate the verdict, and for a new trial; but said notice of intention omitted to state any grounds upon which the motion would be based. Later a bill of exceptions was settled, but there were no specifications of error embodied in the bill. In this ' court we find in the brief filed by counsel for the appellant that an attempt *166has been made to assign…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hostetter v. Brooks Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. First National Bank v. Merchants National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Illstad v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Purcell v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nichols & Shepard Co. v. StanglerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Barnum v. Gorham Land Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Thompson v. CunninghamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Sucker State Drill Co. v. BrockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API