Nichols & Shepard Co. v. Stangler
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Cass County; McConnell, J. Action by the Nichols & Shepard Company against Edward Stangler, in which Joseph Miller was allowed to intervene. From a judgment in favor of intervener, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWallin, J.
The only question before us for decision upon the record in this case is presented by a motion made in behalf of the respondent. It is this: Can this court consider the evidence embodied in the statement and printed in the abstract for the purpose of reviewing the facts? Counsel for the appellant contends that the case was tried as a court case in the District Court, and hence tried under section 5630 of the Revised Codes. This is not conceded by counsel for the respondent. But we deem it unnecessary to consider this question, and shall, for the purposes of the motion, assume that the case…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coveny v. HaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Hostetter v. Brooks Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- O'Brien v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- First National Bank v. Merchants National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- Globe Investment Co. v. BoyumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. BoehmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Carter v. CarterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Prescott v. BrooksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
- Erickson v. Citizen's National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
- State ex rel. McClory v. McGruerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.