Legal Opinion
United States v. Frumento
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 3, 1975No. Crim. 75-322PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BECHTLE, District Judge.
Before the Court are various pretrial motions filed by defendant George Collitt in this multi-defendant criminal case. Collitt is charged in two counts of an eleven-count indictment with conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) and with violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S. C. § 1951. Collitt’s motions seek: (1) to quash the indictment; (2) severance and separate trial; (3) to obtain a bill of particulars; and (4) permission to inspect grand jury notes of testimony. We will discuss each motion separately.
Motion to Quash the Indictment
Collitt contends…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. Lonnie M. Brown, Robert L. Newsome, James B. Finney, Julian E. Seymour, Jr., and Benjamin Clyde Cranford, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Anthony J. Peters, Lawrence Peters, and Jacek OdonerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. FrumentoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- United States v. MandelDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1976
- United States v. MandelDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1976
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.