Legal Opinion

United States v. Frumento

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 18, 1977No. Nos. 77-1090, 77-1127PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROSENN, Circuit Judge.

Appellants Andrew Millhouse and John R. Sills were indicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) and (d) (racketeering activity and conspiracy)1 and 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1) (fraud and false statements in making and subscribing to federal income tax returns for the calendar year 1971 and 1972).2 They *1085were tried before a jury together with co-defendant Rocco Frumento and after a trial lasting almost two weeks were found guilty on all counts.3

I

This case presents several important…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Rose v. BartleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Milan Bagaric, Mile Markich, Ante Ljubas, Vinko Logarusic, Ranko Primorac, and Drago SudarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. Genty v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Anthony Provenzano, Stephen Andretta, and Thomas AndrettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API