Legal Opinion

Anesthesia Advantage, Inc. v. Metz Group

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 15, 1990No. 89-1073PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal orders of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and dismissing plaintiffs’ antitrust and pendent state law claims. 708 F.Supp. 1171. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiffs are nurse anesthetists and an anesthetist professional organization, The Anesthesia Advantage, Inc. (“TAA”).1 Defendants are physician anesthesiologists and their professional organizations, The Metz Group, an unincorporated association, and Anesthesia Associates,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. McLain v. Real Estate Board of New Orleans, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Osgood v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. Melva A. Schalk v. James GallemoreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. TV Communications Network, Inc. v. ESPN, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
  2. Freeman Industries, LLC v. Eastman Chemical Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  3. GF Gaming Corp. v. Black Hawk Casino Owners Ass'n.District Court, D. Colorado · 2004
  4. The Anesthesia Advantage, Inc. v. The Metz GroupCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API